Your Insurers can only refuse to pay out if your state or inebriation/number of people in the car/whatever is a direct cause of the accident. If you're over the limit or overloaded and some numb-nuts drives into the back of you at red traffic lights, your claim will still be honoured. If you hit someone else because you were bladdered or your car was overloaded (affecting it's braking capabilities) then your Insurers can refuse the claim.3v0 said:They don't pay out if you have too many people in the car either.
(irrelevent to this topic i know but I haven't always known that and have driven with too many people in the car a few times in the past)
you sound like my mother, but i believe that too !!! :¬)redliner said:time for a law change me thinks
imo you shouldn't even be able to have the slightest sniff of alchohol then drive![]()
I couldn't agree more, i've said so for years. Any drinker knows too that there's nothing nicer after a pint than another, so why put that temptation there. A zero tolerance policy would IMO be much more successful than the current attitude - also it would alleviate the problems of some people being over when others aren't, being unsure how much you can have etc etc.redliner said:time for a law change me thinks
imo you shouldn't even be able to have the slightest sniff of alchohol then drive![]()
TimFerguson said:I couldn't agree more, i've said so for years. Any drinker knows too that there's nothing nicer after a pint than another, so why put that temptation there. A zero tolerance policy would IMO be much more successful than the current attitude - also it would alleviate the problems of some people being over when others aren't, being unsure how much you can have etc etc.
I agree aswell. NO ALCOHOL whatsoever, whats the point in 1 pint??
BUT from this thread and others -
What I find hard to believe is all the law abiding people on here who drive an Evo and never got caught speeding, or had a bit of trouble or telling off from cops or a summons to court without the reaction of "knobjockey", "serves ya right" "ya chav" "hope they tear up your licence".
Some people are whiter than white if you listened to them or believed them. Funny to hear an Evo owner making the above comments as they are obviously complete hypocrits.
If thats the case I reckon some people should sell their Evos because they are obviously wasted in their posession. Cobwebs after 65mph and 4500rpm on clocks and 5th gear is seized from lack of use. Come on people for FFS.
By the way I dont condone dangerous/careless/drink driving but at some stage we all make a mistake or get caught out. None of as are angels, if we were we would all have bought a Toyota Prius.
Maybe we should give him a :group: Welcome to the MLR, & thanks for using all 24 post to tell us how you drink & drive, regardless if you were under the limit or not.TimFerguson said:I've got to say i think a lot of people have been very harsh on this fella as it was never once proven that he was over the limit.
eeerrr me mate never drunk and drove periodalex evo 4 said:Anyone who says they have never driven there car home after one drink is fibbing so who are we to critisise.
I havent and thats 100% honest. If I did Id say so. When I go boozing which is a rare occasion, Evo stays @ home.alex evo 4 said:Anyone who says they have never driven there car home after one drink is fibbing so who are we to critisise.
No he doesn't need a hug, yet again an overly sarcastic response.motorman said:Maybe we should give him a :group: Welcome to the MLR, & thanks for using all 24 post to tell us how you drink & drive, regardless if you were under the limit or not.![]()