Lancer Register Forum banner

FQ 400 v VI xtreme

2595 Views 37 Replies 15 Participants Last post by  Extremist
After reading the latest edition of wastegate chatter i couldn,t help but notice the offical figures for the 400 arn,t much different to the offical figures for the xtreme. 0 to 60 3.5 for the 400 ,3.9 for the xtreme and 9.1 to 100 for the 400 and 9.5 for the xtreme .After reading the article i can,t help thinking the xtreme would beat the 400 in all but top speed.?
21 - 38 of 38 Posts
jonny f adrine said:
whats happened to the poor blokes original post you horrible bunch of cretins!!

self self self!
I think it has moved on for the better :D

After all its quite obvious after reading wastegate that every car on the road is faster than the FQ400 :p ;)
from the article in the lancer forum magazine i would say that the 400 is crying out for NO's
sure fire way to eliminate most of the hesitance
just get the wizards to fit a system that comes in from the moment you nail the trottle until boost is present
simple to do and very efective

Darbo
simonpalmer said:
After reading the latest edition of wastegate chatter i couldn,t help but notice the offical figures for the 400 arn,t much different to the offical figures for the xtreme. 0 to 60 3.5 for the 400 ,3.9 for the xtreme and 9.1 to 100 for the 400 and 9.5 for the xtreme .After reading the article i can,t help thinking the xtreme would beat the 400 in all but top speed.?
What car do you dri, oh sorry was about to say drive but then that would be far to obvious.

There is always someone with a qiucker car.

ps how can the xtreme be qiucker with stats above :confused: when you have wrote yourself that the 400 times are qiucker :confused:

pps i was in the passenger seat in jases 400 when he dabbled with ianxtreme (top car by the way) and i would have to agree with ians comment, the 400 was all over him ;)
It appears you've upset a few people with your post Si.

Didn't read the article but from the times you posted, there doesn't appear to be much in it.

For my two pence worth, split times are not always a true reflection.
nochips said:
It appears you've upset a few people with your post Si.

Didn't read the article but from the times you posted, there doesn't appear to be much in it.

For my two pence worth, split times are not always a true reflection.
The Extreme cost £40k 5 years ago so in monetary terms theres not much in it and same with performance :shrug:
Leonard said:
The Extreme cost £40k 5 years ago so in monetary terms theres not much in it and same with performance :shrug:
you been on drugs mate :confused:

my 400 would kill a xtream mate i have owened both and 400 is the better car all round

when me and ian had a play i was over him like a rash and when i was infront of him i left tralling well behind :D
fq400duran said:
you been on drugs mate :confused:

my 400 would kill a xtream mate i have owened both and 400 is the better car all round

when me and ian had a play i was over him like a rash and when i was infront of him i left tralling well behind :D
And i :smoker: sh$t myself
fq400duran said:
you been on drugs mate :confused:

my 400 would kill a xtream mate i have owened both and 400 is the better car all round

when me and ian had a play i was over him like a rash and when i was infront of him i left tralling well behind :D
Not saying it was as fast or faster I merely said similar ;)
The V1 Extreme ( not RS450 ) had roughly 310 lb/ft Torque

The FQ 400 has 355lb/ft Torque

Toque Talks !

FQ 400 is the quicker car :D
Extremist said:
The V1 Extreme ( not RS450 ) had roughly 310 lb/ft Torque

The FQ 400 has 355lb/ft Torque

Toque Talks !

FQ 400 is the quicker car :D
I meant the RS450 :D
Extremist said:
The V1 Extreme ( not RS450 ) had roughly 310 lb/ft Torque

The FQ 400 has 355lb/ft Torque

Toque Talks !

FQ 400 is the quicker car :D
My car has a peak torque of 356 lb/ft

I bet it is slower than a 400 if you wind the 400 up and keep it there?

Doh, edited to correct the figure, joke did not really work with the figure i put in before
Leonard said:
I meant the RS450 :D
Well that's a different kettle of fish :p

Also that was £55 k brand new :eek:
Weebl said:
My car has a peak torque of 371 lb/ft

I bet it is slower than a 400 if you wind the 400 up and keep it there?
I didn't know you had to wind the 400 up ! :p
Extremist said:
I didn't know you had to wind the 400 up ! :p
Yeah I used to have a VW that you had to wind up :p
Good one matt !! :crackup: :crackup:
:cry: i test drove the rs450 as well im sorry to say :cry:


it was a disapointment :confused:
I have heard they are a pig too drive with the Cam set up and very tough clutch :eek:
21 - 38 of 38 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top