Lancer Register Forum banner
1 - 20 of 65 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
18,033 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
Before I begin, I would like to take this opportunity to give Nigel and his lovely wife Sarah my heart felt thanks who literally had to bend over backwards to get this registered and taxed yesterday (friday) due to an all mighty 'f' up on my part with the private reg.

Couple of immediate points I noticed:

Off boost - the engine has a lot more 'grunt' meaning that if you are a fan of the traffic light olympics then you will love the way it reaches 2.7-2.8k revs in no time.

That brings me onto the next point, boost kicks in at around 2.7k revs - in the MR that was around 3k so another bonus.

As for on-boost, this does not have the rawness of the MR FQ340 and is very linear but it is still gives a tremendous surge of power all the way upto 5000 revs. I have no doubt that it is capable of reaching a lot higher than 5000 revs but I dare not take it up above there until I do at least another few hundred miles. :)

Handling - only done 200 miles at the moment so its hard to tell. It definitely feels a lot more planted than the MR (I did have some serious issues with the MR FQ340 but the EVO IX seems to have completely eliminated the handling problems I encountered). One another note, the rear of the car is noticably lower than the front by quite a margin so it will be interesting to see how it compares when I start using the car in anger.

Ok onto the those 'front holes' that everyone has been speculating about, it looks like it is not for the air intake or brake ducting as suggested. It clearly seems to be feeding the intercooler in some way but no doubt Nick from NR autosport will confirm this once he is let loose on the car. ;)

Rear diffuser - it's made from black plastic and not carbon fibre as some people thought. I also noticed that the rear port for the exhaust is significantlly larger than the EVO 8 & 8MR and I would be indeed surprised if the APS 3.5" will foul on the diffuser due to the generous gap provided. I compared this with PhilG's evo (who has an APS 3.5") and we may be wrong but it looks like the APS 3.5 will fit fine.

Rear lights - this caught me by surprise; unlike the EVO 8 MR the rear clusters are not smoked but they are not completely clear as in the EVO 8 - I would say veering towards the VIII with a hint of grey about them.

Recaro Seats - brilliant! You sit slightly lower down in comparison to the EVO VIII MR and they are definitely tighter, a few evo owners have sat in it today and they all agree. It also brings the gear stick slightly higher up making it a lot more comfortable when changing gears (but I'm a short arse so that might explain it a bit).

Onto the gearbox and I have to admit I am very very impressed - as its a new car you would expect a little tightness but this gearbox is a complete dream compared to the EVO 8 MR. Very tight, very slick and it hammers into those respective gears very smoothly (something that was not possible in the 8 MR).

Anyway enough of this burble, I only wanted to make a few initial points so onto the pictures (took at PhilG's car wash). :)









 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,532 Posts
:D glad to see youve got it ( eventually ) and washing it already :crackup: :crackup: hope you enjoy and get a few miles in to see how it really goes :coolsm: :coolsm:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,273 Posts
yes very nice car mark, can wait to give it some PhilG lovin after the go carts nxt sat.

much better build quality than in the 8, as your little one can agree, how is his head? :D

PhilG
 

· Registered
Joined
·
18,033 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
PhilG said:
yes very nice car mark, can wait to give it some PhilG lovin after the go carts nxt sat.

much better build quality than in the 8, as your little one can agree, how is his head? :D

PhilG
Heh, I still don't know how I managed to do it - he has a small bump (maybe I should remove the coat hangers ;) ).

regards,

Mark
 

· Registered
Joined
·
216 Posts
Be honest with me here, if you were to step out of a MR 320 / 340 and then jump straight into a IX GSR would the average driver be able to tell much of a difference between the cars on the road?

What I'm trying to establish is if there is much point buying the latest model when such blinding deals are to be had on the remaining MRs that are left. it wouldn't take much (money wise) to tweak a 320 into an even better car.

Cheers
 

· Vendor
Joined
·
2,758 Posts
Colin

Trust you to spot that :D

Mark collected the car very late last night and brought his own plates down with him. It had been raining and the air was still damp so we didn't want to risk the adhesive strips letting go on Marks way home and bye bye rear plate. Hence the combination of adhesive strips and the use of the JDM mount.

I'm sure Mark will sort this as soon as he can stop driving it :)

I'll pick a sunny day to fit yours assuming we'll get one this summer ;)

Car looks great Mark and it's great to hear that you're pleased with it.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,232 Posts
GlobalGB said:
Ok onto the those 'front holes' that everyone has been speculating about, it looks like it is not for the air intake or brake ducting as suggested. It clearly seems to be feeding the intercooler in some way but no doubt Nick from NR autosport will confirm this once he is let loose on the car. ;)
One of the articles posted this week said they're for cooling the intercooler pipework which can reach 100 C.

Rear looks very different to the VII and VIII with a much understated "Evolution" badge.

Liking the car though :)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
427 Posts
Excellent point made earlier about a noticable difference between an 8 MR 320 /340 and a 9 in the "real world".

My guess would be very little - and if it were my choice, I'd always have the 8 over the 9 on looks alone - it's simply a matter of taste.

:D
 
1 - 20 of 65 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top